Arbitration rooms and courtrooms serve similar purposes but differ significantly in design, function and procedures. Arbitration rooms are typically smaller, more flexible, and focused on privacy. They are designed to facilitate private and efficient dispute resolution with features like soundproofing and secure access to maintain confidentiality. Advanced technological integration is common, including audio-visual systems and video conferencing to support remote participation and digital document management. This flexibility and technology are crucial for Arbitration in India​​.

In contrast, courtrooms are larger and more formal, designed to uphold public access and procedural thoroughness. Courtrooms have fixed layouts with designated areas for judges, juries, and the public, reflecting the formal nature of judicial processes. Public access and strict adherence to formal rules of evidence and procedure are hallmarks of courtroom proceedings, making them less flexible than arbitration rooms​​.

These distinctions highlight the differences in Arbitration vs. litigation in India. Arbitration rooms offer a private, technologically advanced, and flexible setting, ideal for confidential and efficient dispute resolution. In contrast, courtrooms are suited for formal, public judicial processes. The flexibility and privacy of arbitration rooms provide significant advantages in Arbitration in India, catering to the evolving needs of modern dispute resolution while maintaining confidentiality and efficiency​.